Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (2.60 seconds)Section 2 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Astrazeneca Uk Ltd. And Anr. vs Orchid Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals ... on 16 May, 2006
30. When I gone through the said decision in detail
though the facts of the said decision is different from the
case on hand, but the principles laid down in the said
decision is aptly applicable to the case of the defendant.
Because the plaintiff has not made out any legal grounds
to seek injunction restraining the defendant from using
the registered aseptic brick pack (commonly known as
tetra pack), when the plaintiff has not objected to use the
trademark or label on a bottle, but he has raised objection
only to use the tetra pack by the defendant on the same
label though the defendant has obtained approval from
46
OS.No.189/2015
the concerned authority. Further defendant's counsel has
argued that by effect of acquiescence as stipulated under
Sec.33 of the Trademarks Act, plaintiff has acquiesced for
the continuous period of 5 years from the registration of
defendant's trademark in 2008 in the use of the
defendant's registered trademark as per Ex.D3. Hence, he
is no longer allowed to apply for declaration that the
registration of the defendant's trademark is invalid.
Kellogg Company vs Pravin Kumar Bhadabhai And Another on 15 February, 1996
2. 1996 SCC Online Del 170- Kellogg Company Vs.
Pravin Kumar Bhadabhai.