Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (1.22 seconds)
Bhupinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 27 January, 2023 cites

Gurcharan Singh & Ors vs State (Delhi Administration) on 6 December, 1977

"Counsel for the State pressed before us that the corruption of which the appellant was guilty prima facie according to the results of the investigation) was substantial. Let us assume so. Even then refusal of bail is not an indirect process of punishing an accused person before he is convicted. This is a confusion regarding the rationale of bail. This Court has explained the real basis of bail law in Gurcharan Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1978 SC 179; (1978 Crl. L.J. 129)."
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 1057 - P K Goswami - Full Document

Ashok Dhingra vs N.C.T. Of Delhi on 3 March, 2000

The object of bail is to secure the appearance of the accused during trial of the case. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of an individual guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. There is no ground to further detain the petitioners. Reliance is being placed on Sanjay Chandra v. CBI reported as 2012(1) SCC 40, Dipak Shubhashchandra Mehta v. CBI reported as 2012(4) SCC 134, Ashok Dhingra v. NCT of Delhi reported as 2000 (9) SCC 533, Giri Raj v. State of Haryana reported as 2019(1) RCR (Criminal) 530, Anil Kumar v. State of Punjab reported as 2013(3) RCR (Criminal) 854, Surinder Pal Singh v. State of Punjab reported as CRM-M-22982-2020, Rajesh v. State of Haryana reported as CRM-M-16050-2021 and Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI reported as Doc ID 2011291.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 37 - Full Document

Crm-M-1326-2013 (O&M) vs State Of Haryana on 3 April, 2013

The object of bail is to secure the appearance of the accused during trial of the case. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of an individual guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. There is no ground to further detain the petitioners. Reliance is being placed on Sanjay Chandra v. CBI reported as 2012(1) SCC 40, Dipak Shubhashchandra Mehta v. CBI reported as 2012(4) SCC 134, Ashok Dhingra v. NCT of Delhi reported as 2000 (9) SCC 533, Giri Raj v. State of Haryana reported as 2019(1) RCR (Criminal) 530, Anil Kumar v. State of Punjab reported as 2013(3) RCR (Criminal) 854, Surinder Pal Singh v. State of Punjab reported as CRM-M-22982-2020, Rajesh v. State of Haryana reported as CRM-M-16050-2021 and Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI reported as Doc ID 2011291.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 175 - N K Sanghi - Full Document

Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022

The object of bail is to secure the appearance of the accused during trial of the case. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of an individual guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. There is no ground to further detain the petitioners. Reliance is being placed on Sanjay Chandra v. CBI reported as 2012(1) SCC 40, Dipak Shubhashchandra Mehta v. CBI reported as 2012(4) SCC 134, Ashok Dhingra v. NCT of Delhi reported as 2000 (9) SCC 533, Giri Raj v. State of Haryana reported as 2019(1) RCR (Criminal) 530, Anil Kumar v. State of Punjab reported as 2013(3) RCR (Criminal) 854, Surinder Pal Singh v. State of Punjab reported as CRM-M-22982-2020, Rajesh v. State of Haryana reported as CRM-M-16050-2021 and Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI reported as Doc ID 2011291.
Supreme Court of India Cites 131 - Cited by 19037 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

Harsh Sawhney vs Union Territory (Chandigarh Admn.) on 20 February, 1978

"14. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Gurcharan Singh and Others Vs. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1978 Supreme Court 179 were followed by the Supreme Court in Miss Harsh Sawhney Vs. Union Territory reported in AIR 1978 SCC 1016 and in 10 of 12 ::: Downloaded on - 28-01-2023 06:47:08 ::: CRM-M-2254-2022 (O&M) 11 CRM-M-15318-2022(O&M) CRM-M-33237-2022 (O&M) CRM-M-41551-2022 (O&M) CRM-M-46039-2022 (O&M) Mohan Singh Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 26 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1   2 3 Next