Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (1.41 seconds)Section 403 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 409 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Velji Raghavji Patel vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 December, 1964
8. Therefore, when the civil dispute has already ended in an award
for dissolution of the firm and the mode of division of immovable properties
has also been set out in the award, once again the same allegation cannot be
9/13
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl. O.P. No.26121, 25903 and 25904 of 2017
pressed into service in the form of FIR that there was forgery and
misappropriation of funds. It is relevant to refer to judgment of the Apex
Court in Velji Raghavi Patel Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in AIR
1965 SC 1433 wherein in paragraph 9 the Apex Court has held that a
partner has undefined ownership along with other partners over all the
assets of the partnership, if he chooses to use any of them for his own
purposes he may be accountable civilly to the other partners, but that will
not amount to any misappropriation. For better appreciation, the entire
paragraph 9 is extracted hereunder:
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1