Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)
Devi Lal Sihag And Others vs State Of Haryana --Respondents on 17 September, 2010 cites

Ram Bhagat Singh And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 4 April, 1990

1. Register B-19 Register B -18 Register B-30 Register B-36 Register A1-Nil Register A1-Nil Register A1-01 Register A1- 2 Register AII-Nil Register A-II-Nil Register A-II- Register A-II- 1 Nil Register C- Nil Register C- Nil Register C - Nil Register C - Nil On the basis of the aforesaid vacancy position, it is stated that on behalf of the State that as against 220 posts, 197 officers are in position including 16 who have been ordered to be reverted to their parent departments. If, the 16 appointees are reverted, a total of 181 officers will remain in position and only 39 vacancies would be available to the State out of which 36 are from Register B, 2 from Register A-1 and 1 from Register A-II. It is further stated that in CWP No. 14129 of 2004 titled as Ram Singh Vs. State of Haryana a direction has been issued to C.B.I to look into the entire process vide judgement dated 1.9.2005. However, the inquiry by C.B.I has been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 18.11.2005 in an S.L.P filed by the Commission.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 78 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Virender Singh Hooda And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 27 October, 2004

Mr. Hooda has relied upon the judgement of the Hon'ble Suprme Court in case of Virender Hooda and others Vs. State of Haryana and others reported as AIR 2005 SC 137. The validity of the State's Act and repealing various circulars forming basis of judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported as AIR 1999 SC 1707 has been upheld. In AIR 1999 S.C Hon'ble Supreme Court had issued directions for appointment of the candidates from the merit list even beyond the advertised vacancies on the basis of the Govt. circulars. The State Govt. enacted the law, whereby the appointment beyond the advertised vacancies was prohibited. The Act also provided for dispensing with the services of those officers who are appointed consequent upon the Govt. instructions and the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Supreme Court while upholding the vires of State Act in general struck down that part of the law which took away the right of the appointed persons to continue in service.
Supreme Court of India Cites 39 - Cited by 209 - Full Document
1