Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.27 seconds)
Girish Kumar Sharma vs High Court Of Judicature on 21 February, 2012 cites

(Dr.) Haniraj L. Chulani vs Bar Council Of Maharashtra & Goa on 8 April, 1996

Reliance has also been placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Haniraj L. Chulani Vs. Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa (supra), wherein Rule 1 framed by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa relating to enrolment of advocates was considered and it was held that the rule restricting entry of person already carrying on other profession does not suffer from vice of any excessive delegation of legislative power and it also does not suffer from absence of any guidelines or exhibits effacement of legislative power. In the instant case, we find that not only the Bar Council of India, but the State Bar Council has also resolved with respect to deletion of Second and Third paras of Rule 49 of the Rules. It cannot be said that the decision is repugnant to any provision or suffered from any bias or vice of arbitrariness or is violative of any provision. It also cannot be said to be beyond the rule making power of Bar Council of India. The State Bar Council has implemented the same, as such, the decision is binding.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 48 - S B Majmudar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next