Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (1.10 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 20 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Article 113 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Somnath Sahu vs The State Of Orissa And Ors. on 21 March, 1969
A 3-Judge Bench decision in the case of Somnath Sahu v.
The State of Orissa & Ors., [1969] 3 SCC 384 is an authority
in support of the position as accepted by the two Constitu-
tion Bench judgments referred to above. There, it was held
in the case of a service dispute that the original order
merged in the appellate order of the State Government and it
is the appellate decision which subsisted and became opera-
tive in law and was capable of enforcement.
Raghubir Jha vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 7 November, 1983
Reliance was placed by appellant's learned counsel on a
recent decision of a Two Judge Bench in the case of Raghubir
Jha v. State of Bihar & Ors., [1986] Suppl. SCC 372. The
conclusion reached is in accord with what we have held but
the legal position was not at all referred to or examined.
It is unnecessary to make any further reference to that
judgment.
Madan Gopal Rungta vs Secretary To The Government Oforissa on 16 March, 1962
In Rungta's case this Court ultimately
held that the order of the State Government had merged into
the order of the Central Government and the High Court was,
therefore, right in its view that it had no jurisdiction.