Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.28 seconds)

S.S.Chheena vs Vijay Kumar Mahajan & Anr on 12 August, 2010

5. Shri Mundargi, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant in Criminal Revision Application No.265/2011 submits that taking allegations in the various statements recorded by the prosecution on its face value, it cannot be said that the prosecution is in a position to point out any act which would amount to instigation, aid or abetment by the applicant to the deceased Sneha to commit suicide. He submits that the material placed on record by the prosecution is not of such a nature which even at, prima facie stage, would establish a mens rea, which is one of ingredients to constitute offence under section 306 of I.P.C. Learned counsel relies on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan Singh v. State of Gujarat, (2010) 8 SCC 628 and in the case of S.S.Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan, 2010 ALL MR (Cri.) 3298 (SC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 547 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Madan Mohan Singh vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 17 August, 2010

5. Shri Mundargi, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant in Criminal Revision Application No.265/2011 submits that taking allegations in the various statements recorded by the prosecution on its face value, it cannot be said that the prosecution is in a position to point out any act which would amount to instigation, aid or abetment by the applicant to the deceased Sneha to commit suicide. He submits that the material placed on record by the prosecution is not of such a nature which even at, prima facie stage, would establish a mens rea, which is one of ingredients to constitute offence under section 306 of I.P.C. Learned counsel relies on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan Singh v. State of Gujarat, (2010) 8 SCC 628 and in the case of S.S.Chheena v. Vijay Kumar Mahajan, 2010 ALL MR (Cri.) 3298 (SC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 254 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document
1