Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.66 seconds)

Sm. Daya Debi vs Chapala Debi on 23 March, 1959

This Court noticed the ratio of the judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Smt. Daya Debi v. Chapla Debi, AIR (1960) Cal.,378 wherein it was held that the assignment of arrears of rent ceased to be rent, they because debt in law and therefore there was no question of paying the same or tendering them in Court for payment to the landlord in eviction proceedings. This Court did not go into the correctness or otherwise of the said view. The contention raised by the counsel for the tenant was not accepted although the view expressed by the Calcutta High Court was not specifically disapproved.
Calcutta High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Ramchander Narsey & Co. vs Wamanrao Shenoy on 13 March, 1969

In Ramchander Narsey & Co. v. Wamanrao Shenoy, UJ (SC) 70(69), this Court approved the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in ordering ejectment of a tenant inter alia, on the ground that the tenant had failed to pay to the transfer landlord arrears of rent including the arrears prior to the transfer of the property in his favour. Incidentally the provisions of the statute considered in that case and in the present case are the same.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

N.M. Engineer And Others vs Narendra Singh Virdi And Another on 12 July, 1994

In N.M Engineer and Ors. v. Narendera Singh Virdi and Anr., AIR (1995) SC 448, this Court again held that in the absence of any assignment of the rent in favour of the transferee the assignee is not entitled to the rent due before the assignment. Negatively it means that if there was an assignment of the arrears then the same could be recovered as arrears of rent by the subsequent transferee landlord.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 26 - Full Document
1