Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.23 seconds)

The State Of Gujarat vs Ali Bin Rajak on 4 May, 1967

cution it was contended that the forged receipt had been produced before the Mamlatdar before its production in the civil court and, therefore, s. 195(1)(c) was inapplicable. It was in this context that the majority of the judges held that no complaint by the court was necessary whereas one learned Judge took the contrary view. It appears to us that in the Gujarat case the use of the forged power of attorney before the Mamlatdar occurred while the execution proceedings were pending but since it was not this user which was the subject matter of the charge the majority of the Judges rightly held that this was not barred by s. 195(1)(c). It was apparently not argued that the complaint of the Mamlatdar was necessary.
Gujarat High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next