Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)
Jubilant Life Sciences Ltd. vs Cce, Thane I on 17 September, 2019 cites

Technocraft Industries (I) Ltd. vs Cce Thane I on 13 August, 2019

5. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides and perused the records. The short point involved in the present appeal for consideration is whether CENVAT Credit lying in balance in the books of account of 100% EOU as on the date of de- bonding, could be transferred to the DTA unit. We find that the issue has been considered by this Tribunal in series of judgments viz. Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd Vs CCE (supra), Tecumseh Products India P.Ltd Vs CC,CE&ST (supra), Hyderabad-IV, John Deere India Pvt. Ltd Vs CCE(supra), Pune-III and CCE, Thane-I Vs Sequent Scientific Ltd(supra). It has been consistently held by the Tribunal in all these cases that the CENVAT Credit lying in balance as on the date of de-bonding of 100% EOU and conversion to DTA unit, could be transferred to the DTA unit and be utilised by the said unit. Following the principle consistently laid down by the Tribunal in aforesaid cases, we do not find merit in the impugned order, which is contrary to the said precedents.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

John Deere India Pvt Ltd vs Cce Pune Iii on 14 June, 2019

5. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides and perused the records. The short point involved in the present appeal for consideration is whether CENVAT Credit lying in balance in the books of account of 100% EOU as on the date of de- bonding, could be transferred to the DTA unit. We find that the issue has been considered by this Tribunal in series of judgments viz. Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd Vs CCE (supra), Tecumseh Products India P.Ltd Vs CC,CE&ST (supra), Hyderabad-IV, John Deere India Pvt. Ltd Vs CCE(supra), Pune-III and CCE, Thane-I Vs Sequent Scientific Ltd(supra). It has been consistently held by the Tribunal in all these cases that the CENVAT Credit lying in balance as on the date of de-bonding of 100% EOU and conversion to DTA unit, could be transferred to the DTA unit and be utilised by the said unit. Following the principle consistently laid down by the Tribunal in aforesaid cases, we do not find merit in the impugned order, which is contrary to the said precedents.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

M/S. Tecumseh Products India Pvt. Ltd vs Cc&Ce, Hyderabad-Iv on 7 June, 2016

5. We have carefully considered the submissions advanced by both sides and perused the records. The short point involved in the present appeal for consideration is whether CENVAT Credit lying in balance in the books of account of 100% EOU as on the date of de- bonding, could be transferred to the DTA unit. We find that the issue has been considered by this Tribunal in series of judgments viz. Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd Vs CCE (supra), Tecumseh Products India P.Ltd Vs CC,CE&ST (supra), Hyderabad-IV, John Deere India Pvt. Ltd Vs CCE(supra), Pune-III and CCE, Thane-I Vs Sequent Scientific Ltd(supra). It has been consistently held by the Tribunal in all these cases that the CENVAT Credit lying in balance as on the date of de-bonding of 100% EOU and conversion to DTA unit, could be transferred to the DTA unit and be utilised by the said unit. Following the principle consistently laid down by the Tribunal in aforesaid cases, we do not find merit in the impugned order, which is contrary to the said precedents.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1