Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)
Paturi Gangi Reddy vs The Special Collector Gnss on 3 October, 2018 cites

Lao-Cum-Revenue Divisional Officer, ... vs Mekala Pandu And Ors. on 9 March, 2004

The 4th respondent, in his letter, dated 06.02.2008, informed the 2nd respondent that he prepared estimates. The 2nd respondent also stated in his Proceedings no.C/152/2007, dated 20.05.2006, that the petitioners are only entitled to development made in the land and that no compensation need be paid towards any structures. The petitioners sent reply to the said proceedings stating that they are entitled to compensation for DKT Patta lands and structures thereon. The Government are obliged under law to pay full compensation for DKT assigned lands on par with patta lands in view of the decision of a Larger Bench of this Court reported in LAO-cum-Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Domalaguda, Hyderabad and others v. Mekala Pandu and others1. The respondents cannot deny compensation to the structures, only on the ground that they are assigned lands. The Divisional Forest Officer in his proceedings in Rc.no.1283/2007/A1, dated 26.02.2008, submitted valuation statements in respect of trees in the lands of the petitioners. The said report was submitted to the 2nd respondent. However, the respondents are not paying compensation for the lands, structures and trees. The said action is illegal. Hence, the writ petition is filed.'
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 52 - Cited by 85 - B S Reddy - Full Document
1