Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)
Delhi Jal Board (Djb) vs Surender Kumar & Ors. on 14 May, 2019 cites

Inspector Rajendra Singh & Ors. vs Uoi & Ors. on 27 March, 2017

In this regard, reference may be made to a decision of this Court in Inspector Inspector Rajendra Singh & Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors. (2017) 240 DLT 576 (DB) wherein this Court, while dealing with a similar fact situation where the appointment of some of the selected candidates was delayed on account of them being initially found to be medically unfit, had allowed the writ petition.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 90 - I Banerjee - Full Document

Mr. Yogesh Kumar vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 16 March, 2010

5. Before the Tribunal, the respondents prayed that since their appointment had been impeded owing to the pendency of the LPA before this Court, they were entitled to be governed by the old pension scheme at par with their batchmates who had been appointed as LDC pursuant to the same selection process initiated in 2001. The respondents also relied on the decision dated 11.02.2011 of the Tribunal in OA No. 3719/2009 titled Yogesh Kumar and Ors. V. MCD and Ors. wherein the Tribunal had upheld the entitlement of the applicants therein to pay scales amd seniority at par with their batchmates. Per contra, the petitioner had opposed the OA on the ground that the respondents' appointment was made only after 01.01.2004, and, therefore, they could neither be granted the benefit of the old pension scheme under the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 nor could W.P.(C)No.4775.2019 Page 3 of 6 their pay be fixed at par with their batchmates who, unlike them, had been appointed prior to 01.01.2004.
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1