Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.33 seconds)Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Manish Jalan vs State Of Karnataka on 11 July, 2008
In the case of MANISH JALAN VS. STATE OF
KARNATAKA reported in (2008) 8 SCC 225, wherein, the
accused was convicted for the offences punishable under
Sections 279 and 304(A) of IPC, having regard to the
settlement arrived between the parties and considering the
affidavit filed by the mother of the victim in the said case,
-7-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:10365
CRL.RP No. 100237 of 2025
HC-KAR
wherein, she had agreed to receive an additional compensation
from the petitioner and had volunteered to compound the
offences against him, the Hon'ble Supreme Court at paragraphs
16 and 17 has observed as follows:
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Hasi Mohan Barman & Anr vs State Of Assam & Anr on 13 November, 2007
9. The offences for which the petitioner has been
convicted and sentenced by the Courts below are non
compoundable offences. Taking into consideration the nature of
offences and the sentence imposed on the accused, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of HASI MOHAN BARMAN AND
ANOTHER VS. STATE OF ASSAM AND ANOTHER reported in
(2008) 1 SCC 184 has held that Courts can consider reducing
the sentence imposed on the accused having regard to the
settlement arrived between the parties.
Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1