Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.21 seconds)
Lal Ji vs State Of U.P.Through ... on 6 February, 2020 cites

U.P.Power Corp.Ltd vs Rajesh Kumar & Ors on 27 April, 2012

It is further submitted by learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel that Neelam Kumari was appointed on the post of Senior Scientific Assistant by direct recruitment on 18.10.2012. It is submitted that since the petitioner was not a member of feeder cadre of Senior Scientific Assistant on 10.2.2014, the date on which the seniority list was published, the name of the petitioner was not included in the said seniority list. It is also submitted that the petitioner was reverted to the post of Scientific Assistant in compliance of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajesh Kumar's case (supra) along with all other employees of the State Government who had been promoted on the ground of reservation between 15.11.1997 and 28.4.2012.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 203 - D Misra - Full Document

Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta . on 26 September, 2018

10. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jarnail Singh versus Lachhmi Narain Gupta has held that the judgment in M. Nagraj is invalid to the extent of asking quantifiable data for Scheduled Caste category as being inconsistent with 9 Judges judgment in Indra Sawhney case and therefore, ignoring the judgment in Rajesh Kumar's case (supra), the petitioner is liable to be considered for promotion on the higher post is not sustainable for the reason that the judgment in Rajesh Kumar's case (supra) has not been overruled and still holds good and this Court is bound by the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court under Art. 141 of the Constitution of India and therefore, the plea of the petitioner is rejected.
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 221 - R F Nariman - Full Document
1