Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.69 seconds)Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 199 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Excise Act, 2009
Jotish Chandra Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar on 26 April, 1968
30. Moreover, it was the government who would be gaining
revenue on the basis of license issued in favour of the petitioner.
Since, there was no motive/gain emerging from the present facts and
circumstances to invoke the provisions of Sections 420/199/200 IPC.
The element of mens rea is sine qua non for the attraction of the
abovementioned provisions. Here the observation of Apex Court in
Jotish Chandra Chaudhary v. State of Bihar, AIR 1969 SC 7, is
relevant:
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ajay Home Product Limited And Anr. vs The State And Anr. on 8 May, 2007
In support of his
arguments he has relied upon the judgment of Ajay Home Product
Limited & Anr. v. The State & Anr. 2007 VI AD (DELHI) 105.
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Neeraj Pal vs State on 18 May, 2016
i. Devender Raj v. State, 2007 (2) JCC 1420.
ii. Jotish Chandra v. State of Bihar, AIR 1969 SC 7.