Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)

Uber India Systems Pvt Ltd., Mumbai vs Dy Cit (Tds)-2(3), Mumbai on 30 January, 2023

The assessee has also relied upon the decision of the Coordinate Bench of ITAT in the case of Neo Sports Broadcast (P.) Ltd Vs. CIT (TDS), Mumbai, [2016] 69 taxmann.com 422 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that "Where a holding company provided bank guarantees for benefit of assessee, its reimbursement by assessee would not come under purview of interest so as to make assessee liable to TDS under Section 194A"
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai vs Acit , Mumbai on 8 March, 2022

The Ld. AR further relied upon the decision in the case of Onward e- service Ltd. Vs ACIT, [2012] 22 taxmann.com 60 (Mumbai), wherein it was held that "Reimbursement of interest by subsidiary to parent company which, in turn, had repaid it to lender bank, did not involve any element of income and, thus, no TDS liability would arise u/s 194A on reimbursement."
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 116 - Cited by 83 - Full Document
1