Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.36 seconds)R. Deivanai Ammal (Died) vs G. Meenakshi Ammal on 13 July, 2004
13. As rightly pointed out by Mr.N.Manokaran, the learned
counsel for the appellants, there is absolutely no pleading in the plaint
regarding the acquisition of the property shown in the second paragraph of
the schedule to the plaint by Thangamuthu. A Division Bench of this Court
in R.Deivanai Ammal (Died and another Vs. G.Meenakshi Ammal and
others reported in 2005-1-L.W.343 had dealt with the nature of the burden
on the coparcener who pleads that property standing in the name of the one
of the coparceners is also coparcenery property. The Division Bench had
held as follows:-
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 30 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
1