Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.38 seconds)

Johnson vs State on 29 February, 2012

9.16. Similarly, reliance placed by the accused upon the case of Johnson Vs. State 2012 III AD Delhi 154 does not help the case of accused. In that case, the testimony of one witness was found by the court to be unsafe to act upon and there was absence of motive to stab the deceased and also that the only possible motive of previous altercation was not proved and therefore, benefit was given to the accused.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 4 - S P Garg - Full Document

Jatinder Pal Singh & Others vs State Of Punjab on 16 September, 1999

In Pal Singh Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1999 SC 2548, it was held that when one witness had seen both the accused running away soon after the incident and the evidence of the eye witnesses was not suffering from any infirmity and was consistent with the evidence of person who saw both the accused running away soon after the incident and there was no reason for the witnesses to falsely involve the accused, the accused can be convicted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 50 - M J Rao - Full Document
1   2 3 Next