J.S. Parihar vs Ganpat Duggar & Ors on 11 September, 1996
18. As a result, we cannot hold that the respondents have wilfully
disobeyed the order of this Tribunal, and have committed any
contumacious act. Therefore, the Contempt Petition does not lie. But, as
per J.S. Parihar (supra), the petitioner/applicant would be at liberty to
challenge the orders now passed by the respondents, subsequent to the
Tribunal's order dated 21.05.2015, treating his period of absence from
the assigned Section, and working in another Section, to have given rise
to a fresh cause of action to him, to agitate the matter before this
Tribunal.