Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 51 (0.83 seconds)

Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977

The principle laid down in Mohinder Singh Gill's case is not applicable where larger public interest is involved and in such situations, additional grounds can be looked into to examine the validity of an order. The finding recorded by the High Court that the report of CBI cannot be looked into to examine the validity of the order dated 4-6-2004, cannot be sustained."
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 4221 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bombay And ... vs Mahindra And Mahindra Limited & Ors on 2 September, 1983

In CIT v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. [(1983) 4 SCC 392 : 1983 SCC (Tax) 336 : AIR 1984 SC 1182] , this Court held that various parameters of the court's power of judicial review of administrative or executive action on which the court can interfere had been well settled and it would be redundant to recapitulate the whole catena of decisions. The Court further held : (SCC p. 402, para 11) Page 55 of 66 BVR,J WP No.25850 of 2019 "11. ... it is a settled position that if the action or decision is perverse or is such that no reasonable body of persons, properly informed, could come to or has been arrived at by the authority misdirecting itself by adopting a wrong approach or has been influenced by irrelevant or extraneous matters the Court would be justified in interfering with the same."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 304 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next