Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.26 seconds)
Munishwar Datt Vashisht vs Smt. Indra Kumari on 28 February, 1963 cites

Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath vs Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd. And ... on 14 November, 1957

It can be contended that nobody other than the father could have told Dr. Dayal Singh about it but It is also quite possible that from the gist of the talk Dr. Dayal Singh might have gathered this. The more important question to my mind, which Dr. Dayal Singh would have been keen to know, was whether heredity had any part to play regarding genial affliction in the case of the girl. As the statement is not free from ambiguity, in the absence of any other prom of attack of insanity at the crucial time, I would hesitate to hold the entry as a persuasive much less compelling evidence of pre-marital insanity, I am asked to draw a conclusion from absence of challenge in the cross-examination of Dr. Dayal Singh regarding this matter and my attention has been drawn to Ganpat Ram v. Kishen Lal, 1958-60 Pun LR 349, Chuni Lal Dkarwa Nath v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 1958 Punjab 440 and Banwari Lal v. Bhag Mal, AIR 1931 Lah 213 (214).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 139 - Full Document

Esther Marie Jackson vs Frederick Ormond Layland Jackson on 22 December, 1911

In Jackson v. Jackson, 1908 P. 308, the wife had asked for a decree of nullity of marriage upon the allegation that the respondent at the time of the marriage was not of sound mind and incapable of entering into marriage contract and subjected to morbid delusions. On the facts of that case, the petitioner had led evidence which satisfied the Court of existence of the unsoundness of mind at the time of the marriage. Bargrave Deane J. posed the question and answered it ill the following words:--
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 14 - Full Document
1   2 Next