Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.52 seconds)The General Clauses Act, 1897
Section 3 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Budha Veerinaidu vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Anr. on 17 August, 1977
In Budha Veerinaidu vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh
rep. by its Secretary Food and Agricultural Department,
Hyderabad and another , the extension of the jurisdiction to the
earlier Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal the service
grievances of employees of Market Committee also came up before
the Division Bench. The Division Bench held that it is clear that
if the management and control of the local fund is entrusted by the
Government to a particular body or authority, that body or
authority would become local authority within the meaning of
clause 31 of Section 3 of the General clauses Act, 1897.
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
18. As held by the Supreme Court in L.Chandra Kumar Vs
Union of India , the Administrative Tribunal is the Court of first
instance and an aggrieved employee on his service grievance has to
invoke the jurisdiction of the Tribunal before coming to this Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The decision of the
Division Bench relied on by the learned Standing Counsel binds
the issue in these writ petitions and in view of the said decision the
petitioners have to avail the remedy as provided under the
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 to seek to redress their service
disputes. The Writ Petitions are liable to be dismissed and are
accordingly dismissed, leaving it open to petitioners to avail the
remedies available under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.