Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.68 seconds)Article 31 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 30 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Indian Railways Act, 1890.
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 72 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 80 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Mutsaddi Lal vs Government-General In Council Through ... on 25 July, 1952
In Mutsaddi Lal's case (E), the same Full Bench reiterated their point of view expressed in the earlier case by again stating that a notice under Section 77 was only necessary in a case where non-delivery was due to loss, destruction or deterioration of goods and not where non-delivery was due to any other cause, e.g. conversion, detention, misconduct, misdelivery, wrongful sale of goods, capricious acts etc. The question that has, therefore, to be determined is whether the plaintiff in this particular case sued on the allegation that the goods had been lost to the railway administration and, therefore, it meant loss to him and he wanted to be compensated for such a loss, or whether the plaintiff's case was that he had sustained loss because the railway administration had failed to deliver the goods to him.