Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 36 (2.61 seconds)

Vijay Dhanuka Etc vs Najima Mamtaj Etc on 27 March, 2014

23. In the present case only the complainant has been effectively examined under Section 202 Cr.P.C., who has stated about the facts/offences alleged in the present case. The deposition of the sole witness is clearly not in respect of the statements made in the written complaint and thus not part of an inquiry. Thus in view of the judgment in Vijay Dhanuka and Ors. vs Najima Mamtaj and Ors. (Supra), it is clear from the said order dated 05.03.2019 that no inquiry as obligatory under Section 202 Cr.P.C. has been conducted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 199 - C K Prasad - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next