Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.20 seconds)The Advocates Act, 1961
Section 32 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 34 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Surender Raj Jaiswal And Ors. vs Vijaya Jaiswal on 7 March, 2003
14. Having regard to the order passed earlier, the
defendants in the suit filed an application to prevent the wife
of the plaintiff to represent the plaintiff in person as G.P.A.
Referring to the judgments of High Court in Sunrender Raj
Jailswal and others v. Vijaya Jaiswal3 and Prabha
P.Shenai v. Ispat Industries Limited4 the trial court held
that as the first respondent can be permitted to represent
the first plaintiff in person; argue the matter and that the
petitioner cannot raise any objection with regard to the
entitlement of the respondent, who was permitted to
represent in person with regard to the bar enshrined in
C.R.P.No.1784 of 2018. It was also held that when the
respondent is not representing in the court as an Advocate,
and she is representing the court, as the wife of plaintiff who
was permitted to represent the first plaintiff in person being
his GPA holder and not as an Advocate, she cannot be
3
AIR 2003 AP 317
4
2016 Law Suit (Bombay) 271
8
curtailed from cross-examining the witnesses. Challenging
the order passed, these Revisions came to be filed.
Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai vs Ispat Industries Ltd on 9 March, 2016
15. Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner mainly relying upon the Division bench
judgment of this court in Madupu Harinarayana @
Haribabu rep. by his G.P.A., T.D.Dayal v. 1st Additional
District Judge, Kadapa and others5, and took me through
paragraphs 3, 5 and 6 of the said judgment, which are as
under:-