Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.43 seconds)
Jagdish Prasad Saini vs State Of Raj & Ors on 10 January, 2011 cites

Prem Narain And Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 November, 2006

At the same time, it was further observed that it would be appropriate to amend the Rules as early as possible to avoid such types of litigations & controversy in future. It appears that taking note of observations made by Division Bench while disposing of Special appeals (Writ) No.920/1996 (Prem Narain Vs. State) vide judgment dt.13/01/1997 (supra), the respondents issued amendment notifications dt.10/06/2008 & 22/08/2008 respectively.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 171 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Kallash Chandra Harijan vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 23 January, 2006

However, it appears that after having taken note of the judgment of this Court (DB) in Kailash Chandra Harijan Vs. State (2006(1) RLR 665) wherein it was held that those who were holders of B.Ed. or other equivalent qualification cannot be treated at par with BSTC and are not eligible for Primary Section, further amendment was made vide notification dt.22/08/2008 and the post of Teacher Gr.III (Sanskrit) was bifurcated into two levels i.e. Primary & Upper Primary School Section and the same break up is made for Teacher Gr.III (General).
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 201 - V Kothari - Full Document
1