Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.53 seconds)
Chartered Financial Analysis ... vs The Institute Of Chartered Financial ... on 5 April, 2010 cites

Popat And Kotecha Property vs State Bank Of India Staff Association on 29 August, 2005

"8. An application for rejection of the plaint can be filed if the allegations made in the plaint even if given face value and taken to be correct in their entirety appear to be barred by any law. The question as to whether a suit is barred by limitation or not would, therefore, depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. For the said purpose, only the averments made in the plaint are relevant. At this stage, the court would not be entitled to consider the case of the defence. (See Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn.)"
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 598 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors.Etc vs Mcdowell & Co.And Ors.Etc on 21 March, 1996

(ii) State of A.P. & Ors. Vs. McDowell & Co. & Ors., (1996) 3 SCC 709 "17. Part XI of the Constitution deals with relations between the Union and the States. Chapter I in this part bears the heading "Legislative Relations: Distribution of Legislative Powers". Clause (1) of Article 245 declares that "Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of Indian, and the Legislature CS(OS) No.210/2004 Page 22 of 59 of a State may make laws for the whole or any part of the State."
Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 491 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next