Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)

Marico Limited vs Agro Tech Foods Limited on 1 November, 2010

In my prima facie opinion, though the word "EAGLE" has been adopted by the plaintiff with respect to clothing, however I refuse to allow exclusive appropriation of the word "EAGLE" to the plaintiff, inasmuch as, unfortunately there is not only one eagle in this world and eagle as a name cannot be allowed to be appropriated exclusively by any one producer of any type of goods similar to the position that a descriptive word mark cannot be allowed to be exclusively appropriated by a manufacturer and/or a seller vide Marico Limited Vs. Agro Tech CS No. 269/19 Retail Royalty Company & Anr. vs. Al Ahmad Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. . Page 6 of 12 Foods Limited, 2010 (174) DLT 279. Also, during the course of trial it will be examined whether plaintiff has first used the word "EAGLE" or there would be other persons who have already used the word "EAGLE"
Delhi High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 60 - V J Mehta - Full Document

Retail Royalty Company vs Pantaloons Fashion & Retail Limited & ... on 23 September, 2015

6. Trademark of the plaintiff is "AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS", whereas the trademark used by the defendant is "TWIN EAGLES". The plaintiff cannot have exclusive appropriation to the word "EAGLE" as it is a descriptive word. On this point, this court is fortified by the following observation of Hon'ble Delhi High in "Retail Royalty Company vs. Pantaloons Fashion & Retail Ltd. & Ors. CS (OS) No. 2872/2015, decided on 23rd September, 2015" :-
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - V J Mehta - Full Document
1