Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.32 seconds)

Chandra Shekhar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 August, 2021

260, Abid Ali Vs. State of MP & Anr. passed on 18/5/2017 in M.Cr.C. No.11363/2016 and a judgment passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Umesh Lilani Vs. The State of M.P. & Anr. passed on 18/7/2019 in M.Cr.C. No.16158/2019 (Indore Bench) as well as the order dated 28th March, 2022 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case o f Satendra Rathore vs. State of MP and Another passed in MCRC 45389 of 2021.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 750 - V Mishra - Full Document

Anurag Soni vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 9 April, 2019

In Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh, this Court held: (SCC para 12) "12. The sum and substance of the aforesaid decisions would be 10 that if it is established and proved that from the inception the Accused who gave the promise to the prosecutrix to marry, did not have any intention to marry and the prosecutrix gave the consent for sexual intercourse on such an assurance by the Accused that he would marry her, such a consent can be said to be a consent obtained on a misconception of fact as per Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code and, in such a case, such a consent would not excuse the offender and such an offender can be said to have committed the rape as defined Under Sections 375 of the Indian Penal Code and can be convicted for the offence Under Section 376 IPC."
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 152 - M R Shah - Full Document
1   2 Next