Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.28 seconds)
Union Of India vs Varadarajan V(Ex.Nk.1381520X) on 21 July, 2025 cites

Ex. Naik Sardar Singh vs Union Of India And Others on 3 May, 1991

8. The legality and correctness of the principle laid down in the cases of Bhani Devi and T.Mohanan was considered by the Full Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in Shama Kaur vs Union of India and Ex- Naik Vijay Singh vs Union of India and upheld the principle laid down in the aforesaid decisions. The Full Bench of the Principal Bench, Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi considered the question whether there should be W.P.(C)No.11753 of 2025 5 2025:KER:54190 condonation of deficiency of service for grant of second pension for DSC service as like regular army personnel in terms of Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence letter dated 14.08.2001 and Para 44 of Army Pension Regulations or be dealt in terms of Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence letter dated 20.06.2017. The Full Bench held that condonation of shortfall in qualifying service upto one year for grant of pension shall also be available to the personnel of the Defence Security Corps. The Full Bench relied on the decisions in the cases of Ex-Sep.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 136 - S R Pandian - Full Document

U.O.I And Anr vs Surender Singh Parmar on 20 January, 2015

7. It is very pertinent to note that a similar issue was considered by this Court recently in W.P.(C)No.11264 of 2025, wherein the findings of the tribunal, condoning a period of 10 months and 26 days to complete the qualifying service of 15 years for a DSC person was upheld. The findings of the tribunal in the impugned order in W.P.(C)No.11264 of 2025, is based on the very same reasoning as referred above. If so, in the light of the afore facts, we do not find any reason to take a different view W.P.(C)No.11753 of 2025 6 2025:KER:54190 than as taken by this Court in W.P.(C)No.11264 of 2025.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 16 - S J Mukhopadhaya - Full Document

Sham Kaur vs Union Of India And Ors on 28 October, 2014

8. The legality and correctness of the principle laid down in the cases of Bhani Devi and T.Mohanan was considered by the Full Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in Shama Kaur vs Union of India and Ex- Naik Vijay Singh vs Union of India and upheld the principle laid down in the aforesaid decisions. The Full Bench of the Principal Bench, Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi considered the question whether there should be W.P.(C)No.11753 of 2025 5 2025:KER:54190 condonation of deficiency of service for grant of second pension for DSC service as like regular army personnel in terms of Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence letter dated 14.08.2001 and Para 44 of Army Pension Regulations or be dealt in terms of Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence letter dated 20.06.2017. The Full Bench held that condonation of shortfall in qualifying service upto one year for grant of pension shall also be available to the personnel of the Defence Security Corps. The Full Bench relied on the decisions in the cases of Ex-Sep.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - K Kannan - Full Document
1