Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.32 seconds)
Ut Of Jammu & Kashmir Through ... vs Dr. Jyoti Gupta D/O Sh. Subash Gupta R/O ... on 12 March, 2026 cites

Dr. Preeti Srivastava & Anr vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Ors on 10 August, 1999

19. It is a trite law after the judgment of Preeti Srivastava v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (1999) 7 SCC 120, wherein the Supreme Court has, in categoric terms, held that the Medical Council of India‟s Regulations framed under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 in the matter of fixing the standards of medical education are supreme and override any contrary rule or regulation framed by the State Government. Para 35, 36, 37 and 38 of the judgment are relevant for our purposes and are, therefore, set out below:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 288 - S B Majmudar - Full Document

Minor P. Rajendran vs State Of Madras & Ors on 17 January, 1968

This Court, therefore, upheld the additional criteria framed by the State for admission which were not inconsistent with the norms for admission laid down by the University Act. Since these additional qualifications did not diminish the eligibility norms under the University Act, this Court upheld the additional criteria laid down by the state as not affecting the standards laid down by the University Act. The question of diluting the standards laid down, did not arise."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 181 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document
1   2 Next