Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.77 seconds)Chandrasekaran S/O. Malla Munuswamy ... vs V. Doss Naidu S/O. Late Veeriah Naidu on 29 June, 2005
(i) Chandrasekaran and Others v. V.Doss Naidu [2006 (2) LW 159],
wherein in paragraph Nos.18 and 19 it has been held as follows:-
Chinnathambi vs Anjalai Respondent on 22 September, 2006
It is a well accepted principle of law that an Advocate Commissioner
should not be appointed to find out the possession of the property, which has
to be adjudicated only by oral and documentary evidence. Under such
circumstances, the order of the Lower Court suffers from material
irregularity and it is not in accordance with the principles laid down in the
above decisions. ...."
Meenakshi vs Vennila on 6 September, 2008
(iii)Meenakshi v. Vennila and Another [2009 (1) MLJ 516], wherein in
paragraph No.9, it has been held as follows:-
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1