Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.29 seconds)Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Malbro Appliances P. Ltd. on 14 September, 2006
He has further submitted that the decision in the
case of Malbro Appliances P. Ltd., reported in
2007 (208) ELT 503 (Del),
also cannot be applied because the facts of the case on hand are not
identical to the facts of the case of the assessee in the Malbro
Appliances P. Ltd., (Supra).
Tata Engineering And Locomotive Co. ... vs Collector Of Central Excise on 9 August, 1988
In support of this submission
Mr.Oza also relied on the following
decisions (I) Coats Viyella India Ltd., Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, 2004 (133) ELT 229 (SC) (ii) TATA
Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Vs. Collector of Central
Excise, 2006 (203) ELT 360 (SC) (iii) Commissioner of Central Excise
Vs. Wimco Ltd., 2007 (217) ELT 3 (SC) (iv) Commissioner of Central
Exicse Vs. GTC Industries Ltd., 2008 (228) 505 (SC) (v) Commissioner
of Central Excise Vs. Srikumar Agencies 2008 (232) 577 (SC) (vi)
Stead Fast Paper Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise, 1983 (12)
ELT 744 (Guj.).
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S.Wimco Ltd on 28 May, 2009
In support of this submission
Mr.Oza also relied on the following
decisions (I) Coats Viyella India Ltd., Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, 2004 (133) ELT 229 (SC) (ii) TATA
Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Vs. Collector of Central
Excise, 2006 (203) ELT 360 (SC) (iii) Commissioner of Central Excise
Vs. Wimco Ltd., 2007 (217) ELT 3 (SC) (iv) Commissioner of Central
Exicse Vs. GTC Industries Ltd., 2008 (228) 505 (SC) (v) Commissioner
of Central Excise Vs. Srikumar Agencies 2008 (232) 577 (SC) (vi)
Stead Fast Paper Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise, 1983 (12)
ELT 744 (Guj.).
Commissioner Of Central ... vs Srikumar Agencies Etc. Etc on 27 November, 2008
In support of this submission
Mr.Oza also relied on the following
decisions (I) Coats Viyella India Ltd., Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, 2004 (133) ELT 229 (SC) (ii) TATA
Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Vs. Collector of Central
Excise, 2006 (203) ELT 360 (SC) (iii) Commissioner of Central Excise
Vs. Wimco Ltd., 2007 (217) ELT 3 (SC) (iv) Commissioner of Central
Exicse Vs. GTC Industries Ltd., 2008 (228) 505 (SC) (v) Commissioner
of Central Excise Vs. Srikumar Agencies 2008 (232) 577 (SC) (vi)
Stead Fast Paper Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise, 1983 (12)
ELT 744 (Guj.).
Union Of India vs M/S Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills on 12 May, 2009
This Court after considering the decision of Commissioner
of Central Excise Vs. Malbro Appliances, 2007 (79)
RLT 109 (Delhi), Union of India Vs. Dharmendra
Textiles, 2008 (231) ELT 3 (SC), Union of India Vs. Rajasthan
Spinning & Weaving Mills, 2009 (238) ELT 3 (SC), K. P. Pouches
(P) Ltd., Vs. Union of India, 2008 (228) ELT 31 (Delhi),
Commissioner of Central Excise, Rohtak Vs. J. R. Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.,
2009 (238) ELT 209,
has taken the view that the order passed by the Tribunal
retaining the penalty of 25% of the duty
amount seems to be quite justified. For the reasons recorded in the
said two judgments, we do not feel it necessary to take any
different view in this Appeal.
Commissioner Of Central Excise ... vs M/S J.R. Fabrics (P) Ltd on 30 April, 2009
This Court after considering the decision of Commissioner
of Central Excise Vs. Malbro Appliances, 2007 (79)
RLT 109 (Delhi), Union of India Vs. Dharmendra
Textiles, 2008 (231) ELT 3 (SC), Union of India Vs. Rajasthan
Spinning & Weaving Mills, 2009 (238) ELT 3 (SC), K. P. Pouches
(P) Ltd., Vs. Union of India, 2008 (228) ELT 31 (Delhi),
Commissioner of Central Excise, Rohtak Vs. J. R. Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.,
2009 (238) ELT 209,
has taken the view that the order passed by the Tribunal
retaining the penalty of 25% of the duty
amount seems to be quite justified. For the reasons recorded in the
said two judgments, we do not feel it necessary to take any
different view in this Appeal.
Section 11 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
M/S. Coats Viyella India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise Madurai on 4 July, 2001
In support of this submission
Mr.Oza also relied on the following
decisions (I) Coats Viyella India Ltd., Vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, 2004 (133) ELT 229 (SC) (ii) TATA
Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., Vs. Collector of Central
Excise, 2006 (203) ELT 360 (SC) (iii) Commissioner of Central Excise
Vs. Wimco Ltd., 2007 (217) ELT 3 (SC) (iv) Commissioner of Central
Exicse Vs. GTC Industries Ltd., 2008 (228) 505 (SC) (v) Commissioner
of Central Excise Vs. Srikumar Agencies 2008 (232) 577 (SC) (vi)
Stead Fast Paper Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise, 1983 (12)
ELT 744 (Guj.).
1