Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.34 seconds)
Ram Niwas Agarwal vs Reshmi Devi & Ors on 27 November, 2009 cites

Akhileshwar Kumar & Ors vs Mustaqim & Ors on 12 December, 2002

In the 3 case reported in AIR 2003 SC 532 Akhileshwar Kr. & Ors. v. Mustaqim & Ors., it is, inter alia, observed that even if the person, who requires the premises, is engaged in some business, it does not mean that he should not start his own independent business. Moreover, the tenant could not prove that plaintiff No. 3 is settled in any business activity. Further, the case of the landlords of personal necessity cannot be rejected on the ground that plaintiff No. 3 and his wife are income tax assessees. In the absence of order of court, directing Plaintiff No. 3 to produce his income tax return, the tenant cannot complain that he did not produce the Income Tax Returns.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 53 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Mrs. Veena Rani And Ors. vs Mrs. Ishrati Amanullah And Anr. on 14 June, 1984

9. Furthermore, it has been held in Paragraph-12 of the Division Bench Judgment reported in 1985 PLJR 390 Mrs. Veena Rani v. Mrs. Ishrati Amanullah that the power of partial eviction cannot be exercised in a manner as if the court is to partition the building in question between two co-sharers. It may also be noted that nothing has been said by the tenant in the written statement on the aspect of partial eviction nor any evidence has been led by him on this aspect.
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 8 - N P Singh - Full Document
1