Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)Trf Ltd vs Energo Engineering Projects Ltd on 3 July, 2017
3. The principal ground of challenge in the present petition is that the
arbitrator was unilaterally appointed in terms of the agreement, in which
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:SHITU
NAGPAL
Signing Date:29.03.2023
13:03:07 O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 124/2022 Page 1 of 3
circumstances the arbitral proceedings are void ab initio in line with the
judgments of the Supreme Court in TRF Ltd. vs. Energo Engineering
Projects Ltd. [(2017) 8 SCC 377] and Perkins Eastman Architects DPC
and Another vs. HSCC (India) Limited [(2020) 20 SCC 760].
Perkins Eastman Architects Dpc vs Hscc (India) Limited on 26 November, 2019
3. The principal ground of challenge in the present petition is that the
arbitrator was unilaterally appointed in terms of the agreement, in which
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:SHITU
NAGPAL
Signing Date:29.03.2023
13:03:07 O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 124/2022 Page 1 of 3
circumstances the arbitral proceedings are void ab initio in line with the
judgments of the Supreme Court in TRF Ltd. vs. Energo Engineering
Projects Ltd. [(2017) 8 SCC 377] and Perkins Eastman Architects DPC
and Another vs. HSCC (India) Limited [(2020) 20 SCC 760].
Section 12 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
1