Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)Section 489C in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 489 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 489B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 489D in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Rajesh Ranjan Yadav @ Pappu Yadav vs Cbi Through Its Director on 16 November, 2006
15. At this stage, I would like to put reliance upon
the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case
of Rajesh Ranjan Yadav @ Pappu Yadav Vs. CBI
Through its Director, reported in (2007) 1 SCC 70,
wherein, the Apex Court has laid down that, while
considering an application for regular bail, the
Courts shall have to take into consideration, the
following aspects,
Section 489E in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Maharashtra vs Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao on 29 September, 1989
17. So far as Criminal Misc. Application No.131/2025,
which is a successive bail application, is
concerned, it is a well settled principle of law
that when the successive application comes before
the Court, the Court would be very conscious while
considering the same. It is also a settled
position of law that successive bail applications
are permissible under the changed circumstances
Page 13 of 15
Uploaded by PATIL GAUTAMBHAI GOPALBHAI(HC00190) on Mon Jan 13 2025 Downloaded on : Mon Jan 13 21:35:37 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/24982/2024 ORDER DATED: 10/01/2025
undefined
and the changed circumstances must be substantial
one which has direct impact on the earlier
decision and not merely a cosmetic changes which
are of little or no consequences. As held by the
Apex Court in State of Maharashtra Vs. Captain
Buddhikota Subha Rao, reported in AIR 1989 SC
2292, that successive bail application can be
entertained by the Court when substantial change
is established by the accused, which would entitle
him/her for getting bail in successive bail
application. The Court should not pass the order
of releasing him/her on bail in successive bail
application merely establishing some cosmetic
change between time gap of two applications. There
should be drastic change during the period between
two applications, which would entitle the accused
for bail.