Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.90 seconds)
Mohinder Singh (Died) Through His Lrs vs Banta Singh And Others on 8 May, 2012 cites

Atla Sidda Reddy vs Busi Subba Reddy & Ors on 6 May, 2010

In this regard, the Supreme Court in the case of Alta Sidda Reddy (Supra) has held that if there are two sale-deeds, then the sale deed prior in time shall prevail and at the time of execution of second sale deed, the vendor would not have any right or title in the property which can clothe the subsequent purchaser with any right or title as no one can transfer a better title that he possess. In view thereof, the first question which has been raised by counsel for the appellant is decided in his favour.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 16 - A Kabir - Full Document

Jasvir Singh vs Mohan Singh And Others on 19 March, 2010

In respect of the first question of law, counsel for the appellant in the second appeal has relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of "Alta Sidda Reddy Vs. Busi Subba Reddy and others" 2010 (4) Civil Court Cases 146 (SC) and in RSA No.877 of 1991 -6- CWP No.1753 of 1986 respect of the second question of law, has relied upon various decisions of this Court in the case of "Tejbir Singh Vs. Darshan Kumar (dead) and others" 2009 (3) RCR (Civil) 654, "Amrik Singh Vs. Tarlok Singh and others" 2004(3) RCR (Civil) 447, "Nazar Singh and others Vs. Nand Lal and others" 1992 PLJ 175 and "Jasvir Singh Vs. Mohan Singh and others" 2010 (3) RCR (Civil) 654.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 2 - A Singh - Full Document

Siri Kishan And Ors. vs Mem Chand on 9 October, 1981

Counsel for the appellant in the second appeal has submitted that though the learned Appellate Authority had reversed the finding of the learned trial Court with regard to the applicability of Section 30 of the Act, in view of the decision of this Court, in the case of "Siri Kishan and others Vs. Mem Chand (died) represented by LRs" 1981 PLJ 532, on the ground that the transferee can enforce the transaction against the transferor and can follow the land allotted to the transferor during consolidation, yet the suit has been dismissed on the ground that the subsequent RSA No.877 of 1991 -5- CWP No.1753 of 1986 vendees of the legal heirs of Wazira Singh are protected under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (for short 'the 1882 Act') being bona fide purchasers. It is contended that if the first sale deed dated 21.6.1965 (Ex.P1) executed by Wazira Singh has been accepted as valid then how can the subsequent sale deed dated 30.7.1984 (Ex.D1) by his heirs in favour of subsequent vendees be held to be valid because they were left with no right in the property in dispute which could be transferred. In this regard, he has referred to the questions of law which were framed by way of his separate application, which are as follows:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Tejbir Singh vs Darshan Kumar (Dead) And Ors on 5 March, 2009

In respect of the first question of law, counsel for the appellant in the second appeal has relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of "Alta Sidda Reddy Vs. Busi Subba Reddy and others" 2010 (4) Civil Court Cases 146 (SC) and in RSA No.877 of 1991 -6- CWP No.1753 of 1986 respect of the second question of law, has relied upon various decisions of this Court in the case of "Tejbir Singh Vs. Darshan Kumar (dead) and others" 2009 (3) RCR (Civil) 654, "Amrik Singh Vs. Tarlok Singh and others" 2004(3) RCR (Civil) 447, "Nazar Singh and others Vs. Nand Lal and others" 1992 PLJ 175 and "Jasvir Singh Vs. Mohan Singh and others" 2010 (3) RCR (Civil) 654.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1