Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.42 seconds)

Kumbakonam Bank, Limited, Represented ... vs K.R.M.P. Shanmugham Pillai And Ors. on 19 July, 1955

29. The Bench referred with approval to the summary of the legal position as expressed by Mayne in para 307, 11th Edn., of Treatise on Hindu Law and Usage: we may usefully extract the said passage referred with approval, which appears to have been adopted in a later pronouncement of that Court in Kumbakonam Bank Ltd. v. Shanmugam Pillai, (1956) 1 Mad LJ 58: (AIR 1956 Mad 306):
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Brij Narain vs Mangla Prasad on 24 November, 1923

42. We shall now examine the binding nature of the mortgage from the stand-point of an alienation made for the discharge of antecedent debts. The power of a father to alienate coparcenary property including his sons' shares for the payment of his own antecedent debts is a recognised feature of the law settled as such, since the pronouncement of the Judicial Committee in Brij Narain v. Mangala Prasad, AIR 1924 PC 50. A full Board of the Judicial Committee had addressed itself to the various aspects of father's alienations and expressed themselves by laying down certain propositions. The propositions laid down may be recalled with advantage.
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 80 - Full Document
1   2 Next