Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.61 seconds)

Shahal H. Musaliar & Anr vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 18 August, 1993

3. It is the case of the petitioners that under the Government Order way back on 14.09.1993, the petitioners are duly recognized as a MEI and the petitioner's status as a minority institution is under the constitutional scheme for availing the protection/guaranteed rights under Article 30 (1) of the Constitution of India and is pursuant to the directions issued by the Apex Court in the case of Shahal H. Musaliar and another Vs. State of Kerala and others1 (Shahal H.) and post Unni Krishnan J.P. and others Vs. 1 1993 (4) SCC 112 -6- NC: 2025:KHC:7731 WP No. 16622 of 2023 State of Andhra Pradesh and others2 (Unni Krishnan).
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

T.M.A.Pai Foundation & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Ors on 31 October, 2002

4. It is stated that in light of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of T.M.A. Pai Foundation and others Vs. State of Karnataka and others3 (T.M.A. Pai Foundation) law being settled, there was no occasion for the State to "so review", on the contrary accepting its right under Article 30 (1) of the constitution and treating all the institutions of the society as MEI for the purpose of regulating admissions in the institutions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 123 - Cited by 914 - Full Document
1   2 Next