Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.03 seconds)The Delhi Rent Act, 1995
Raghunandan Saran Ashok Saran (Huf) vs Union Of India And Ors. on 18 January, 2002
21. The question which remains to be answered is that in a situation, if
the tenancy has been contractual terminated, what would be the liability of a
person to continue in possession thereafter. Is he liable to pay damages ?
Or is he liable to pay the earlier rent ? The proposition of law put forth by Ld.
Counsel for plaintiff that he is liable to pay market rent / a sum of money not
exceeding market rent upon the ratio of Raghunandan Saran's case, in my
opinion is not made out.