Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.67 seconds)

State Of Bihar & Anr vs Dr. Asis Kumar Mukherjee & Ors on 3 December, 1974

26. It may be true that if the statute is ambiguous, the Court can iron out the creases but to confer a power upon a Tribunal, which it does not necessarily have, is not the job of interpreter. Thus, the decisions of the Supreme Court in State of Bihar v. A.K. Mukherjee, reported in (1975-I-LLJ- 198) (SC) and State of Karnataka and Ors. v. Hansa Corporation, upon which Mr. Sengupta placed strong reliance cannot have any application.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 77 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Grindlays Bank Ltd vs Central Government Industrial ... on 12 December, 1980

27. It must be noted that in Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. The Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Ors. (supra) the Apex Court has clearly made a distinction between a procedural power of review and a substantive power of review thus, whereas an incidental or ancillary power refers to procedural aspect, a substantive power must be specifically conferred. An order can be passed only for the ends of justice but the Court cannot in the guise of passing ancillary or incidental power, take a decision which goes to the very root of its jurisdiction. 28.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 558 - A P Sen - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next