Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.20 seconds)

Jhaverilal Maganlal vs Emperor on 25 August, 1949

This view was reiterated by the same learned Judges in Maganlal Radhakishan v. Emperor(2), but, for the reasons already given, we are unable to accept this as a correct statement of the law. We are of the opinion that while the failure to comply with the requirements of section 161(3) might affect the weight to be (1) A.I.R. 1945 Nag. 1. (2) A.I.R. 1946 Nag. 173. (3) I.L.R. [1937] Nag. 178, 1048 attached to the evidence of the witnesses, it does not render it inadmissible.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 12 - V Bose - Full Document
1   2 Next