Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 43 (0.49 seconds)
Randhir Singh @ Budha And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 6 February, 2023 cites

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

The said provision has to be strictly followed (Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, 2012(4) R.C.R.(Criminal) 543 : 2012(4) Recent Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 549 : (2012)10 SCC 303). However, in a given case, the High Court can quash a criminal proceeding in exercise of its power under section 482 of the Code having regard to the fact that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and the victim has no objection, even though the offences are non-compoundable. In which cases the High Court can exercise its discretion to quash the proceedings will depend on facts and circumstances of each case. Offences which involve moral turpitude, grave offences like rape, murder etc. cannot be effaced by quashing the proceedings because that will have harmful effect on the society. Such offences cannot be said to be restricted to two individuals or two groups. If such offences 7 of 15 ::: Downloaded on - 08-02-2023 05:53:19 ::: CRM-M No. 17208 of 2022 --8--
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Narinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 27 March, 2014

There can be no hard and fast line constricting the power of the High Court to do substantial justice. A restrictive construction of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may lead to rigid or specious justice, which in the given facts and circumstances of a case, may rather lead to grave injustice. On the other hand, in cases where heinous offences have been proved against perpetrators, no such benefit ought to be extended, as cautiously observed by this Court in Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab &Ors. [(2014) 6 SCC 466, ¶ 29], and Laxmi Narayan [(2019) 5 SCC 688, ¶ 15].
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 15111 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next