Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.50 seconds)Shri Shekhar Ghosh vs Union Of India & Anr on 1 November, 2006
Learned counsel has relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the
case of Shekhar Ghosh Vs. Union of India and another as reported
in (2007) 1 SCC 331 to contend that where passing of the impugned
order entails civil consequences, the principle of natural justice is
required to be followed.
State Of M.P.& Ors vs Sanjay Nagayach & Ors on 16 May, 2013
8. Learned Government Advocate further submitted that so far as
reliance placed by the petitioner in the case of Sanjay Nagayach
(supra), the same is not applicable in the facts and circumstances of
the present case since the case relates to supersession of an elected
Managing Committee/Board, whereas in the present case, the
Administrator has been removed.
Kranti Associates (I) Pvt. Ltd vs Masood Ahmad Khan on 6 July, 2007
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the impugned
order dt.25.03.2020 is contrary to the basic principle of natural justice
and has been passed in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of
India. No opportunity of hearing has been provided to the petitioner
before passing the impugned order. The impugned order is without
W.P. No.7496/2020
& Connected Matters
18
any reason, therefore, the same is contrary to the law as Laid down by
the Apex Court in the case of M/s Kranti Associates Pvt. Ltd. and
another Vs. Masood Ahmed Khan and others reported in (2010) 9
SCC 496. The impugned order entails the civil consequences,
therefore, without opportunity of hearing the appointment of the
petitioner on the post of Administrator could not have been cancelled.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 53 in The Meghalaya Co-operative Societies Act [Entire Act]
The Meghalaya Co-operative Societies Act
1