Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.27 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Bombay Gas Co. Ltd vs Gopal Bhiva & Ors on 9 May, 1963
It is further seen from the record that no objection has been
I.D. No. 66/06 Page 28 out of 31
taken by the respondent/management in respect to the jurisdiction of
this Court to try and adjudicate upon the instant dispute between the
parties in the instant application moved on behalf of the
applicant/workman under the provisions of Section 33C (2) of the
I.D. Act, 1947 (as amended upto date) against the
respondent/management. All that there has been pleaded in
opposition to the instant application is that the same is belated and the
amount as claimed by the applicant/workman in the same against the
respondent/management is not due to him against it. Vide provisions
of citations (1970) 1 SCR 51, Town Municipal Council, Athani Vs.
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli & Ors, (1968) 1 SCR 140,
Chief Mining Engineer, East India Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Rameshwar
and Ors., (1964) 3 SCR 709, Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. Vs. Gopal Bhiva
& Ors. it has been held that no period of limitation has been
prescribed in law in respect of application u/s 33C (2) of the I.D.
Act, 1947 ( as amended upto date).
Section 12 in The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Town Municipal Council, Athani vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli ... on 20 March, 1969
It is further seen from the record that no objection has been
I.D. No. 66/06 Page 28 out of 31
taken by the respondent/management in respect to the jurisdiction of
this Court to try and adjudicate upon the instant dispute between the
parties in the instant application moved on behalf of the
applicant/workman under the provisions of Section 33C (2) of the
I.D. Act, 1947 (as amended upto date) against the
respondent/management. All that there has been pleaded in
opposition to the instant application is that the same is belated and the
amount as claimed by the applicant/workman in the same against the
respondent/management is not due to him against it. Vide provisions
of citations (1970) 1 SCR 51, Town Municipal Council, Athani Vs.
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli & Ors, (1968) 1 SCR 140,
Chief Mining Engineer, East India Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Rameshwar
and Ors., (1964) 3 SCR 709, Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. Vs. Gopal Bhiva
& Ors. it has been held that no period of limitation has been
prescribed in law in respect of application u/s 33C (2) of the I.D.
Act, 1947 ( as amended upto date).
Municipal Corporation, Faridabad vs Siri Niwas on 6 September, 2004
"In this regard, it would be pertinent to
mention the observation of threeJudge
Bench of this Court in the case of Municipal
Corporation, Faridabad V. Siri Niwas (2004)
8 SCC 195): (2004 AIR SCW 5184), where it
is observed:
R.M. Yellatti vs The Asst. Executive Engineer on 7 November, 2005
I have heard the submissions of ARs of both the parties
and also have gone through the file. AR for the workman has relied
upon citations: 2005 IX AD (S.C.)261 R.M.Yellati Vs. The
Asstt.Executive Engineer; 2010 LAB I.C. 1089 Director Fisheries
Technical Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Chavda; (1970) 1
SCR51 Town Municipal Council, Athani Vs. Presiding Officer,
Labour Court, Hubli & Ors; (1968) 1 SCR 140 Chief Mining
Engineering, East India Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Rameshwar and Ors;
(1964) 3 SCR 709 Bombay Gas Co. Ltd. Vs. Gopal Shiva & Ors.;