Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)

R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder vs Venkatesha Gupta & Ors on 9 April, 2002

In R.V.E. Venkatachala Gounder (supra) this Court has held that apart from the age and condition of the building the capacity of the landlord to demolish and reconstruct, the useful utilization of the property which would on demolition and reconstruction make available more space to be occupied by human beings for residential/non-residential purposes and the genuine desire of the landlord to earn economic advantage are relevant factors pointing to the bona fides of the requirement. In the present case it has been found that the building is an old construction requiring demolition and reconstruction. Out of the total area of the property only a part is built up and substantial portion is lying open and vacant. There is pressure of population on the developing city and several multi-storey complexes have come up in the vicinity of the property. There is nothing to cast a shadow of doubt on the bona fides of the landlords pleading an immediate need for demolition followed by reconstruction. No fault can be found with the finding of fact arrived at by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 26 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Vijay Singh Etc. Etc vs Vijayalakshmi Ammal on 10 October, 1996

The High Court has rightly set aside the judgment of the Appellate Authority and ordered eviction following the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in Vijay Singh & Ors. case. It is true that the landlords have not pleaded and relied on the age and condition of the building as one of the components of their bona fides but that is immaterial. The age and condition of the building has been determined and is available for assessing the bona fides of the landlords' need.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 21 - N P Singh - Full Document
1