Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.98 seconds)Queen-Empbess vs Dolegobind Dass on 18 December, 1900
Queen Empress v.
Dolegobinda Dass is really wide enough to cover the
other categories mentioned in the later decisions.
Whenever a Magistrate is satisfied that the previous
order of dismissal was due to a manifest error or has
resulted in a miscarriage of justice, he can
entertain a second complaint on the same allegations
even though an earlier complaint was dismissed under
S. 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ..."
Section 204 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 245 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ram Narain Chaubey vs Panachand Jain on 13 September, 1948
It appears to me that the test laid down in the
earliest of the aforesaid decisions.
Dwaeka Nath Mondul vs Beni Madhab Banerjee on 18 February, 1901
It was held
by this Court in Pramatha Nath's case (supra).
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Doraisami Aiyar And Ors. vs T. Subramania Aiyar And Ors. on 26 October, 1917
384); Doraisami Aiyar v. Subramania Aiya (AIR 1918
Mad 484).
Ramchand Manjimal vs Goverdhandas Vishindas Ratanohand on 17 February, 1920
In full agreement with the decisions of the
Judicial Committee in Ramchand Manjimal v.
Goverdhandas Vishandas (1920 (47) IA 124) and
Abdul Rahman v. D.K. Cassim and Sons (AIR 1933
PC 58) and the authorities of the English
Courts upon which these pronouncements were
based, it has been held by this Court that the
test for determining the finality of an order
is, whether the judgment or order finally
disposed of the rights of the parties.