Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)

Jagatnarayansingh Swarupsingh ... vs Swarupsingh Education Society And Anr. on 26 November, 1979

FA.1634.2012 (J) C3.doc 4.3) Mr. Naik, learned Senior Advocate, relying upon Jagatnarayansingh Swarupsingh Chithere vs. Swarupsingh Education Society [(1980) Mh.L.J 372] and Marutirao Vishwanath Bagal vs. Dinkar Kashinath More [2004 (4) Mh.L.J. 982], submitted that period for which the said change report was concerned, viz. 2007 to 2010 is over long back, and thereafter multiple elections have taken place and long list of subsequent change reports are pending before the concerned Assistant Charity Commissioner for a period from 2010 to 2025/2027. Details of change reports are placed on record. Relying on the said judgments, it is submitted that because of the subsequent developments and multiple new changes, the whole purpose of fresh consideration/inquiry is unnecessary and academic and question in abstract should not be decided normally. It is submitted that whole inquiry, upon remand, is unnecessary.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 24 - Full Document

Marutirao Vishwanath Bagal And Ors. vs Dinkar Kashinath More And Ors. on 26 July, 2004

It is submitted that only exception carved out by this Court in judgment of Marutirao Vishwanath Bagal (Supra) is the case of fraud and forgery made out in relation to change report in question. It is submitted that in the facts of this case, no sufficient case of fraud and forgery is made out as there is not a single complaint filed by any of the revision applicants against the present Appellant No. 1-Ramesh D. Sable invoking the penal provisions under IPC.
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 11 - A Oka - Full Document
1