Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.42 seconds)
M/S. Vigneshwara Transport Company vs Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax on 28 November, 2024
cites
Section 132 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Section 50 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]
A.K. Gopalan vs The State Of Madras.Union Of India: ... on 19 May, 1950
42. We may also add here that if the directions of
the Apex Court in PUCL'case (supra) which are now re-
enforced and approved by the Apex Court in K.T.
Puttaswamy (supra) as also the mandatory rules in regard
to the illegally intercepted messages pursuant to an order
having no sanction of law, are permitted to be flouted, we
may be breeding contempt for law, that too in matters
involving infraction of fundamental right of privacy under
Article 21 the Constitution of India. To declare that
dehorse the fundamental rights, in the administration of
criminal law, the ends would justify the means would
amount to declaring the Government authorities may
violate any directions of the Supreme Court or mandatory
statutory rules in order to secure evidence against the
citizens. It would lead to manifest arbitrariness and