Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 395 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Shahzad Shamim Son Of Late Mohammad Ayub ... vs The Chancellor, Veer Bahadur Singh ... on 8 May, 2006
Similarly, the judgment rendered in Mohammad Shahzad (Supra) is also not applicable in the present case because that pertains to warrant of arrest whereas in the present case, the proceeding under Section 125 CrPC has been finalized and for compliance of the order dated 25.06.2025, the said proceeding has been initiated and the agricultural land has been attached. Learned counsel has relied on the Government Order mentioning therein that since the land of the applicant is less than one hectare, therefore, the same cannot be attached is also not sustainable. The order dated 28.11.2025 is a judicial order and has been issued in consonance with Section 461 BNSS read with Section 144(3) BNSS. Also, the Government Order has been issued by the Executive and cannot be enforced upon Courts. The said argument is also rejected. Moreover, the applicant has filed the criminal revision before this Court challenging the order dated 25.06.2025, in which no interim relief has been granted.
Uma Kant Pandey And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 10 December, 2019
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has admitted that against the order dated 25.06.2025, the applicant has filed Criminal Revision No. 1123 of 2025 (Uma Kant Pandey Vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others) before this Court in which no interim relief has been granted.
Falguni Gaurav Joshi vs Gaurav Joshi on 24 July, 2015
The facts of the case of Deepa Joshi (Supra) is quite different and that pertains to income of the husband who was employed in Canara Bank, therefore, the said judgment is not applicable.
1